-
• #102
Lazy arse, just checked google ;-)
-
• #103
hah so what is the difference?
they never list Air arrrgghhhh
-
• #104
this is a minefield, Im getting a DSB nivachrom frame set sat, which "is a revolution in tubing construction, its was developed according to a new type of stress analysis that introduces a third dimension in a tubes butting" eh?
I just hope it rides well, feels light as a feather :)
@diable, you really have to dig to find the exact one you have. see it as fun... -
• #106
Very odd.
I was chatting to Fabrizio from Columbus only the other day about the tubing. We were both chatting about the weaknesses of the single bolt setup. Maybe its not columbus' design?forgot to mention it has Columbus stamped across the BB shell.
-
• #108
Does anyone know anything about Columbus "Brain" tubing?
I know, it sounds strange but that's what it really says on the sticker.Thanks
-
• #109
Brain - We strongly recommend Columbus Brain for cyclecross designs. This tube set is an excellent choice for creating a light, tough and strong cyclecross frame. Brain tubes feature round over-sized diameters that offer good resistance to accidental impacts. This allows for excellent durability for the life of the frame. Brain Tubes can either be lugged or fillet brazed. Large choice of wall thickness and butted diameters to strengthen your cyclecross frame. Brain tubing can also be used on either a road or track frame.
Literally Googled Columbus Brain Tubing, this was the second link...
-
• #110
Thanks. Not that I intend to do any cyclocross.
Further Googling tells me it is no longer in Columbus' range of tubing and dates from the mid to late 90's and suggests that:- it was better than Thron
- it was not as good as SL/SLX
- it may or may not be about the same as 531
- buying a second hand frame made with it may or may not be a good deal
The above "opinions" came from another cycling forum found by Google so may or may not mean anything.
Anyway, who wants secondhand, stale forum opinion, I want new, fresh, opinions .... :-)
- it was better than Thron
-
• #111
This is a new one on me. Anyone seen this sticker before? Maybe 3 means tretubi?
sorry 4 pic , can't see writing. It says "Aspessore Conico" -
• #112
bump ^anyone know this tubing?
-
• #113
hi benny, a better picture would help, but:
the word "columbus" in quotes (although i have seen a very few like this, but mostly pre-1975)
the dove not being white (red dove was 1960's)may mean it's not columbus, or possibly old pre-1970; have a look at this blog and perhaps post a question on it:
http://italiancyclingjournal.blogspot.com/2007/11/columbus-steel-tubing-for-frame.html
and a spessore conico ~ conical thickness, probably in context of: reinforced conical thickness molybdenum chrome steel
-
• #114
Anyone heard or have experience of Columbus endurance tubing? http://newyork.craigslist.org/brk/bik/3050698408.html
-
• #115
Anyone heard or have experience of Columbus endura(n)ce tubing? http://newyork.craigslist.org/brk/bik/3050698408.html
That should clear things up a little ;), although search results aren't to clear either...
-
• #116
Woops, feel like bit of a plonker but even with correct spelling hardly anything turns up apart from links back to my posts!
-
• #117
That should clear things up a little ;), although search results aren't to clear either...
Though this pic does have the spelling as endurance http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_693JCT80K-E/TFvFNvE6jvI/AAAAAAAAB4k/qWVRA_UJ-1Y/s1600/+De_Rosa_Endurance_05.jpg
-
• #118
what age is the frame? I' ve a .zip file with all the columbus tube types in it but no mention of minimax.
Off the top of my head it sounds like a more lightweight version of their Max tubing or a slightly oversize dia tubeset that isn't elliptical like the Max version is, but this could be shite.
Can email you the .zip file if you like.
-
• #119
Max tubeset is surprisingly chunky coming in at 1.9kg compared to 1.67 for the EL
-
• #120
just found this:
http://italiancyclingjournal.blogspot.co.uk/2011/01/steel-lovers-columbus-re-introduces-max.html
is indeed a newer version of Max with different metallurgy.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_atrK-jBKJKY/TUA-_J3Rp_I/AAAAAAAAOs8/nNx6ki0jtEU/s1600/minimax_img1.gif
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_atrK-jBKJKY/TNdBfvQIACI/AAAAAAAANZs/9WPq8a5Ow40/s1600/max+porter+2.jpg -
• #121
definitely looks slightly slimmer profile to my Max frame, some prawny bikes on that blog too:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-jRr2_QiJqVM/UZ662lLHfPI/AAAAAAAAgVI/FLIn10p6QdE/s1600/max+virginia5.JPG
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-7II1HSietYo/USEHES7m9tI/AAAAAAAAe0o/Hf9DfSv7zI4/s1600/somecmini4.jpg
"The owner of this frame writes:
I think this is Somec’s Dynamic model. Most other Somecs in your blog are ProMax model.
The Dynamic model has a unicrown fork with dropped seat stays from the seat ‘lug’ and has MiniMax tubes in Somec catalogs available. The tubing decal on mine says Max but the 'D' in my frame’s SSN of D110 may well correspond to Dynamic (number is on BB and steerer tube).
The ProMax model has Max tubes, a microfusion fork crown & most all Promax’s have seat stays more traditionally situated on the side of seat ‘lug’. There is one ProMax with dropped seat stays but it does not have unicrown forks.
Who knows, mine could still be a ProMax simply due to its Max tubeset. I’ve gone through the Somec catalogs at Somec website to arrive at this estimation: http://www.somec.com/en/factory/vintage_catalogs/"
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-yWBDRe7p3FE/UQsurupB1fI/AAAAAAAAekM/64BPr92DOeY/s1600/somecd1.jpg
-
• #122
looks pretty-never seen a purple Bianchi before.
Funny that it's lugged though-all the others I saw on the blog were lugless with non-standard stays although I doubt that was exhaustive.
Carbon forks might give a better feel-the original steel ones are tres stiff and ahead steering is much better imhop. Feel pretty chuffed to have a MAX frame at the price i paid, seems like a real leap forward in the development of steel frames and I just love the form where the tubes join-some of the Merckx MXL frames go for a totally insane price too.
-
• #123
They were designed to be used by big sprinters for the most part so I doubt you'll have a weight issue, the weight of the frameset is also c. 1.9 kg with the steel forks so it's not stupid light.
As long as its being ridden and enjoyed I see no crime in it being used for a SS beater anyway!
-
• #124
What Columbus Tubeset has the best combination of strength and weight?
Lightweight enough to be enjoyable when road riding, yet strong enough for some cross abuse and occasional light tours?
-
• #125
What Columbus Tubeset has the best combination of strength and weight?
Lightweight enough to be enjoyable when road riding, yet strong enough for some cross abuse and occasional light tours?
zona tubing would be the right choose for your bike
Yea, read that, thanks
My old Vivalo was Columbus 'Genius' tubing, can't find anything about it...