Tour de France 2013

T-V could you explain why you don't trust the current testing regime? When I read in L'Equipe this morning that Froome was tested three times in 24 hours I kinda assumed that that is pretty rigorous.

If you're talking EPO, then there's no way to hide the glow if you're tested three times in 24 hours - and surely the passport would do away with any possibility that bags have been involved?

I think Froome is about 69 kg and Armstrong was about 75kg - with the different training regimes and diets and that extra weight, does that put what he did into plausible rather than "not normal"?

Also, would Sky / Brailsford / Froome be that stupid to go flying up AX 3 and Ventoux with all the questions they knew it would raise if there was doping involved?

Should this be in doping >>>>>>>>>>?