Tour de France 2013

To summarise my view, Chris Froome’s performance level is on the boundary between plausible and implausible. I do not trust the existing testing regimen sufficiently to dispel all doubt regarding his performance. As a ‘fan of cycling’ I believe it would be to Froome and the sports benefit to take further steps to demonstrate his performances are credible. I think Brailsford’s comments today are a positive step. If Sky live up to their founding promise of superior transparency in conjunction with superior performance they can change the sport for the better.

T-V could you explain why you don't trust the current testing regime? When I read in L'Equipe this morning that Froome was tested three times in 24 hours I kinda assumed that that is pretty rigorous.