That article is also seems confused, in that it states that drivers want cyclists to insure their bicycles. I'm sure that the drivers questioned actually wanted cyclists to carry 3rd party insurance in case they cause damage to drivers' cars, not to have their bikes insured against theft etc.
That article is also seems confused, in that it states that drivers want cyclists to insure their bicycles. I'm sure that the drivers questioned actually wanted cyclists to carry 3rd party insurance in case they cause damage to drivers' cars, not to have their bikes insured against theft etc.