Every year there's a "cyclists should be registered, cyclists should be trained, cyclists should pay tax" article.
Realistically, who is going to pay for the implementation? It's a total non-argument as the costs and policing would far outweigh any return from the cyclists.
Meh. Helmet debate >>>
This a million times. Cycling is allegedly getting more and more popular right, thus more people on the street. Bikes are small/multi use vehicles. I.e they serve multi purposes for transport, recreation, fitness etc. bought new and second hand. So how do you enforce a tax on all these bikes being ridden at random times and sold/bought randomly
Too. Cars have a large footprint, bikes barely any. Itll be like the 30's prohibition, a futile excercise that will backfire.
Education, education, education.
This a million times. Cycling is allegedly getting more and more popular right, thus more people on the street. Bikes are small/multi use vehicles. I.e they serve multi purposes for transport, recreation, fitness etc. bought new and second hand. So how do you enforce a tax on all these bikes being ridden at random times and sold/bought randomly
Too. Cars have a large footprint, bikes barely any. Itll be like the 30's prohibition, a futile excercise that will backfire.
Education, education, education.