Doping

Have you read it? Or just the article?

Bits and peices of the article, and various analysises of it as the internet warriors have got to work analysing Vayer's analysis, including some scientists with PhDs and everything. Basically a vast amount of variables ignored. But of course I could be wrong. I usually am.

Btw interesting tweet from Vayer the other day:

Now i know. About christopher. Now, call him Foolrme. I hope he'll win the 100eme Tour. For fun.