I remember a couple of follow-on decisions like that where the batting side push on and take back the initiative. Sure, if England's bowlers tore threw them again, they'd have won it by now, but it's unnecessary.
Were the series 0-0 it would be stupid not to enforce it, but not following-on here guarantees NZ can't win and wins England the series.
I remember a couple of follow-on decisions like that where the batting side push on and take back the initiative. Sure, if England's bowlers tore threw them again, they'd have won it by now, but it's unnecessary.
Were the series 0-0 it would be stupid not to enforce it, but not following-on here guarantees NZ can't win and wins England the series.