You are reading a single comment by @dan and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • ^^^There's nothing massively wrong with the component choice, just the marriage of components and frame is pointless. For a start - lightweight/performance-driven modern parts on a noodly, lugged steel frame? The frame will negate most of the performance gains of the components. Descending on wobbly steel with deep section carbon braking surfaced wheels, sounds like a nightmare. I know no-one gives a toss about that here, but...

    Then there's the geometry of the frame - massive headtube on a steel frame, with a negative rise stem? Why? Reasonably large fork rake disguised by a straight fork? What looks like semi-compact geometry on a lugged steel frame?
    The whole thing looks really slack, but the build says it's going to be ridden aggressively. Yuk.

    I am aware (however) that this build pretty much ticks every box for lfgss road bike/show pony:

    • rotors, tick.
    • rat/raw finish steel frame, tick.
    • chinese crabbon, tick.
    • weird geometry, tick.
    • stupid weenie saddle and seatpost, tick.
    • weenie brakes, tick
    • suitably postmodern background, tick.
About

Avatar for dan @dan started