Are G4S knowingly trying to get someone killed?

seriously, you think the main reason is to protect the money? The money is insured. I'm pretty shocked to see that you don't realise it is to protect the people carrying that money. They get held up at gun and knife point far too regularly. I'm sure I could find more instances of cash transit drivers/workers being injured by robbers that cyclists who have been injured as a direct result of their parking. There are far fewer of them than there are cyclists so the percentages would be even higher.

Don't be so naive, unless you can suggest a safer way to carry the money then you will just have to ride around them and take some responsibility for yourself.

I'm sure if there was a back or side entrance they would park outside that instead of having to be on a busy street, bit you would probably find some minor inconvenience in that also.

I do believe it's about money. They deploy as few staff as possible, and park wherever is most convenient to themselves, regardless of the danger to other people.

I do not live in dreamworld, I realise that sometimes causing an obstruction cannot be avoided, but at other times it can. Whilst I accept that there is a danger to drivers of security vans that they may be attacked, it is logically incoherent to ameliorate this threat by putting other people in danger. It is only the dangerous parking, at or on busy junctions that I am particularly incensed about.