You've said that concentrating testing on the Pro/Elite ranks is pointless, about which we disagree. What you haven't said is how you would pay for a similar testing regime to be applied to the other 99.99% (or 99.999999995% on your figures), and what the point of such a costly exercise would be. UK Anti-Doping spends about £1.5M p.a. on testing, you're asking for a 10,000 fold (or 20,000,000,000 fold on your figures) increase to £15bn (£30 trillion) p.a.
Or maybe you meant the £1.5M current spend is wasted? Well, obviously the right wing nutter in my house thinks it's wrong that this is funded from general taxation, but as a proportion of professional sportsmen's earnings it's a drop in the ocean (about 0.1% levy on just Premiership soccer players would more than cover it) so it should not be rocket science to get the players to fund it.
You've said that concentrating testing on the Pro/Elite ranks is pointless, about which we disagree. What you haven't said is how you would pay for a similar testing regime to be applied to the other 99.99% (or 99.999999995% on your figures), and what the point of such a costly exercise would be. UK Anti-Doping spends about £1.5M p.a. on testing, you're asking for a 10,000 fold (or 20,000,000,000 fold on your figures) increase to £15bn (£30 trillion) p.a.
Or maybe you meant the £1.5M current spend is wasted? Well, obviously the right wing nutter in my house thinks it's wrong that this is funded from general taxation, but as a proportion of professional sportsmen's earnings it's a drop in the ocean (about 0.1% levy on just Premiership soccer players would more than cover it) so it should not be rocket science to get the players to fund it.