SLRs are not just bulkier, nosier, slower (slower to compose, focus, expose and advance) but also tend to demand a less fluid style and better lighting.
What? Why?
Without a mirror swinging about one can learn to shoot rather slow speeds.
Huh?
One can easily focus in much lower light on a rangefinder than an SLR.
Really don't think so.
Thanks for your input on the Rockwell alternatives,
but to be honest I disagree with pretty much everything you said about SLR vs. rangefinder.
What? Why?
Huh?
Really don't think so.
Thanks for your input on the Rockwell alternatives,
but to be honest I disagree with pretty much everything you said about SLR vs. rangefinder.