I love tuning fork movements. Partly because it is a complete technological blind alley. No sooner had Bulova perfected it than quartz movements came and blew it in to the weeds. But as a result there is something romantic about them, that quartz will never have, and despite the fact that it's electronic there is a human-made quality about the way the fork has to be tuned precisely for accurate timekeeping. They also make a lovely sound when you hold them up to your ear.
The thing to beware of with them is that the older ones may require a type of battery that is no longer available. Do a bit of research to find out what to avoid, or whether you can substitute another kind of battery in there.
The best tuning fork movements are the ESA 9162 / ESA 9184 ones that Omega put in the F300 line - these were based on the final generation of movements which had fine adjustment of the forks and were impervious to changes of position, angle, g force, etc. The real clincher is that they also take modern batteries, so there's no reason why you can't wear one as a daily. As well as Omegas they went in Longines and a few others.
If you're worried about a fake one don't be. Who would fake an obsolete movement that only a few people want? Who could? Not even Omega have all the parts for these anymore. Happily I have a guy who knows them like the back of his hand and can do all the servicing on them.
I'm watching the clean one. I have a fascination for Bulova cause of the fork.
As for fakes, I realise the dead end fork won't be imitated.
But what of the others like Tag and Omega and so on. If they have a lot of good feed back, is that enough?