The Guardian's bike blog

*"who could ride more freely than a cyclist in London traffic?"

*Is that supposed to be ironic - sometimes I can't understand the implied tone of text. If it's a serious comment, what the fuck are they talking about? Are they saying cycling in London traffic is the most unrestrained riding you can do, or are they using the verb 'ride' to refer to motorcycles as well, or are they using it to mean 'ride/drive'? I don't get it. Sounds wrong whatever.

They've probably never experienced the unbridled joy of riding around the countryside, where you can please the inner anarchist inside you by imagining lots of traffic lights and sailing through them scot-free.