I don't know which thread it was in but it has been troubling me for a while .... Back in the summer(?) there was a gauntlet thrown down regarding someone's braking abability. They stated that they could stop quicker, with only a rear brake, than someone with a front or two brakes. This was to be decided by a "brake off" in Swinley Woods, I believe. Does anyone remember this and who won?
I don't know which thread it was in but it has been troubling me for a while .... Back in the summer(?) there was a gauntlet thrown down regarding someone's braking abability. They stated that they could stop quicker, with only a rear brake, than someone with a front or two brakes. This was to be decided by a "brake off" in Swinley Woods, I believe. Does anyone remember this and who won?