+1, I have come to think of my fellow cyclists so dressed as "Bradars", or if describing the situation to someone Boardman-Brad, Hump-Brad, No-lights-Bradette etc.
Ha, Boardman and a Hump. Then you know you're doing it right.
My theory, if you care to know, is that the rugby/football kit chumps (for this is what they appear to be, to a man) own only one set of clothes suitable for 'sport' and what you are seeing is this very kit.
As the rest of the wardrobe consists of suits, blue jeans, deck shoes and pale blue long-sleeve shirts, there is no other option for undertaking the Herculean effort of a 3 mile commute.
These people have probably never chosen their own clothes, going straight from school uniform to business uniform, with the weekend clothes essentially a uniform for those who have no idea what to wear when given free reign. Their clothes would have been chosen by their mothers, and still are, unless they are married in which case their wives choose.
These people are also a disgrace to humanity, they may not know it but they are, and should be made to pay.
Ha, Boardman and a Hump. Then you know you're doing it right.
My theory, if you care to know, is that the rugby/football kit chumps (for this is what they appear to be, to a man) own only one set of clothes suitable for 'sport' and what you are seeing is this very kit.
As the rest of the wardrobe consists of suits, blue jeans, deck shoes and pale blue long-sleeve shirts, there is no other option for undertaking the Herculean effort of a 3 mile commute.
These people have probably never chosen their own clothes, going straight from school uniform to business uniform, with the weekend clothes essentially a uniform for those who have no idea what to wear when given free reign. Their clothes would have been chosen by their mothers, and still are, unless they are married in which case their wives choose.
These people are also a disgrace to humanity, they may not know it but they are, and should be made to pay.