maybe he just means that we were naive to think that armstrong won all those titles clean when it was pretty much common knowledge that doping was rife.
I think you're right, but if doping is still rife, we should suspect current winners?
He asumes the premise that today's top riders are clean, which we know isn't true.
I think you're right, but if doping is still rife, we should suspect current winners?
He asumes the premise that today's top riders are clean, which we know isn't true.