Lance Armstrong... greatest doper there was or ever will be

Is Neil Stephens still involved with Cycling Australia?

Double standards if he is.

Over 500 tests, still never failed one.

If the piss being tested wasnt lance armstrongs its no wonder

Probably, but this thread is a much better read.

Agreed, the level is quite high indeed.

the level is quite high consistently and suspiciously close to, but below, the threshold for an adverse analytical finding

ftfy

Tomorrow's Observer's sports section;

^^^serious? can't be.

the level is quite high consistently and suspiciously close to, but below, the threshold for an adverse analytical finding

ftfy

Good luck for the analytical finding. Have fun.

There are rumours that the Lance story will be given as a prescription for men who suffer premature ejaculation, a couple of pills before to get laid.

Same pills can be used by the women of these men, to forget with who they have to sleep with.

Wankers they can use it as well, in front of the mirror.

I see your medication is wearing off.

Yours is gonna be wearing on.

I've enjoyed reading the first couple of pages of this thread again.

Tomorrow's Observer's sports section;

For realz:

1 Attachment

goodness.

Tomorrow's Observer's sports section;

ftfthem

Joey Barton's tweets – OMFG.

Who is he?

?

The Federal investigation was a criminal fraud investigation with a different level of proof required for a conviction. They also had to prove USPS monies were used for illegal purposes cos doping isn't illegal.

Are you sure the doping substances aren't illegal? Importing steroids into Australia, for example, is a criminal offence. Lefranceland probably has similar laws - I'm sure Willy Voet's book spoke of illegal substances rather than just "gear that's banned in sport".

And the DS who extended his career at Motorola just to carry on riding with LA. Who was very much part of the inner circle. Who was a DS at Discovery and Astana. Mind you he did say on the radio today that he knew nothing about it, thank god for that...

"In 1989 Yates tested positive in a doping test in the first stage of Torhout-Werchter."

http://www.dopeology.org/incidents/Yates,-S-positive/

In the case of Yates, Sky seemed to have ignored their Zero Tolerance rules anyway. This isn't 'suspected involvement' this is 'test failed'.

Is Neil Stephens still involved with Cycling Australia?
Double standards if he is.

Stephens had admitted to EPO use years ago, during/after Festina(?). Whitey was named recently, right so he's stepping down until the shit clears.

http://www.dopeology.org/incidents/Stephens-admission/

Armstrong team would accept lie detector tests:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cycling/19941030

Bizarre.

what's bizarre is that when asked if Lance was prepared to take the same lie detector test he suddenly wasn't very sure if that would be ok or even be possible.

Why is that I wonder? Same shit, different day-rules and a burden of proof for everyone else apart from him.

Of those, 11 came forward. Many others would and have refuted many of the allegations. Other than Tyler Hamilton, Frankie Andreu, Floyd Landis and Jonathan Vaughters I'm not calling anyone a liar - but I am calling those four liars."

That's verging on an admission to me.

http://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/nike-anheuser-busch-trek-and-others-quit-corporate-support-for-lance-armstrong

How much of this nonsense is Armstrong's legal team milking him for as much cash as they can?

Seriously, the arguments they are putting forward are so flimsy that my nearly three year old could point out the flaws in their logic.