Using the goal for support is already a foul that should be called by goal-refs.
No it's not. It's never been a foul in Europe (no crossbars traditionally) and is a hotly contested (but universally detested) move in NA.
Oddly if the goalie shifts the goal then you should be penalised, but most of them time goalies do this to put the goal back in place and it has historically gone uncalled.
Agreed that taller goals are better for sweet keeper saves (active goalies for the win), we should fall in line with the NAH norm in my opinion (3', or 91.5cm), our current goals are 80cm tall I think.
No it's not. It's never been a foul in Europe (no crossbars traditionally) and is a hotly contested (but universally detested) move in NA.
Oddly if the goalie shifts the goal then you should be penalised, but most of them time goalies do this to put the goal back in place and it has historically gone uncalled.
Agreed that taller goals are better for sweet keeper saves (active goalies for the win), we should fall in line with the NAH norm in my opinion (3', or 91.5cm), our current goals are 80cm tall I think.