I'm curious to hear some feedback on the whole crease ruling. Is it something that should be included in "more serious" tourneys....
IMO, yes. No double goalie = much better polo. It was still possible to defend, but the rule rebalances the game in favour of attacking play.
I'd also want to see the rule modified so that one attacker only is allowed in the crease, and I also think the crease should be 1m wide from each goalpost, and 2 or maybe even 2.5m from goal-line.
IMO, yes. No double goalie = much better polo. It was still possible to defend, but the rule rebalances the game in favour of attacking play.
I'd also want to see the rule modified so that one attacker only is allowed in the crease, and I also think the crease should be 1m wide from each goalpost, and 2 or maybe even 2.5m from goal-line.