• Any chance you could be more specific as to why it is a poor article?

    The usual stuff ... the problem is that 'the roads are dangerously designed' when the focus should be much more on driver behaviour (which, to be fair, is mentioned, but its significance is not understood). 'Equally, however, no safety campaigners would ever seek actively to discourage the use of helmets'--not true. Some do. Relying too heavily on that DfT report doesn't adequately address the vast body of research that's been conducted and presents some opinions in an unacceptable way. It gives numbers for the 'pro' side but not for the 'con' side, a frequent trick of helmet advocates. Plus a few other points that it would take too long to explain.

About