Thanks for that hippy, very insightful. So would a correct reading of this graph be that if you're climbing at > 1700m/h you're probably doping? Which would suggest that Sky aren't..?
Thanks for that hippy, very insightful.
So would a correct reading of this graph be that if you're climbing at > 1700m/h you're probably doping? Which would suggest that Sky aren't..?
As you will see up thread, w/kg is a better measure than VAM which is partly governed by conditions and characteristics of the climb.
On that score, most climbs have been run off at 6 watts / kg, which is accepted as a threshold for clean athletes.
@deleted started
London Fixed Gear and Single-Speed is a community of predominantly fixed gear and single-speed cyclists in and around London, UK.
This site is supported almost exclusively by donations. Please consider donating a small amount regularly.
As you will see up thread, w/kg is a better measure than VAM which is partly governed by conditions and characteristics of the climb.
On that score, most climbs have been run off at 6 watts / kg, which is accepted as a threshold for clean athletes.