You say don't go on about doping and then you bring it up again. It seems you are happy to discuss it, as long as no-one disagrees with your view.
On point 2, what possible animus could motivate people?
Hardly, I said you had made your point and were repeating yourself everytime Sky rode well, and that I understood it and it had made me think, but I didn't want to keep hearing until it went beyond mere assumption and innuendo, which was all it was. That said it had made me doubt Sky's performances to the point where it was affecting my enjoyment of the event, so it was a real relief to see the various articles responding to both Sky's/the pelotons performances and Wiggins' rant which reassured me Sky isn't doping.
As for point 2, definitely directed more at the twats in the clinics than anyone here, apart from Hippy :)
Hardly, I said you had made your point and were repeating yourself everytime Sky rode well, and that I understood it and it had made me think, but I didn't want to keep hearing until it went beyond mere assumption and innuendo, which was all it was. That said it had made me doubt Sky's performances to the point where it was affecting my enjoyment of the event, so it was a real relief to see the various articles responding to both Sky's/the pelotons performances and Wiggins' rant which reassured me Sky isn't doping.
As for point 2, definitely directed more at the twats in the clinics than anyone here, apart from Hippy :)