Royalty

Yes, I knew this, but it is a matter of scale.

A rather low blow there Clive, but I don't think I have ever read the Daily Express; my newspaper of choice is the Guardian. As for my knowledge of political theory is concerned, it is certainly broader than many other people's I think. I have lived in many countries, and as long as I have known myself, I would discuss politics - first with my grandfather (regarding the Vietnam War), then later as an adult, when living in Cameroon, I would discuss the political climate with any and everyone. Sadly though, most of my exposure was to career diplomats, or academics. But I still managed to talk with the average citizen, to find out what they wanted politically. I was very interested.

In Africa, we* have Presidents that work to change the law and the constitution, so as to enable themselves to continue in power long after is legal. Paul Biya is one, and there are many others. So, is a democratically elected president really such an improvement, for everyone?

*It should be THEY, as I am not a citizen of any African country.

I believe my point was, that the present Monarch is above financial corruption. My affection for the rest of her family becomes drastically reduced, the further the apple falls from the tree.

And to answer your last statement.....Paul Biya isn't a dictator. He is democratically elected. But as with many presidents, he is moulding the system to suit himself. And yes, it is expected that Paul Biya somehow will hand over to his son, who is still a mere youth.

The American example of a republic, and a their presidential system - I like that one. The others, I don't like as much. And its my view that the monarchy here isn't so bad. But even Liz won't hand over to Chuck, now would Andy or Freeloader Eddie be given a shout, because she knows worthless when she sees it. Its working well here........but clearly, its not universally appreciated.

GAG, a president, however democratially elected who moulds the process to keep himself in power and place his som in after him is not democratic.

The issue we have is with the monarchy and not with one individual. A system that means that Charles inherits by virtue of his birth is wrong. The Queen has no option, under the current system, to do anything other than hand over to her eldest son.

You may like the American system but you do not explain why you don't like Parliamentary democracy and why you dismiss the republican systems of Ireland, Finland or Germany (or indeed many other places).

I like the American system more, for the simple reason that I have lived there, so know it better. I've never been to Ireland*, Finland or Germany, nor looked into their politics, so couldn't give any opinion on those. But especially Germany's, I think could be an excellent example.

I did also say, when I posted earlier, that it is highly possible that coming from Grenada may have coloured my judgement, as to affections for this monarchy. It is also the case that Third World presidents may have put me off somewhat from the republican system. A misfortune of fate, is where I was raised, and the peoples that I was raised with. .

*Financial irregularities?

This is how it was...........political view versus political view.