• Nope, I didn't say that.

    Ah, I may have misunderstood you there then, but I still think it's a bad precedent to set and will result in future complications.

    Please point out the positives (other than potentially removing a team form the qualifying event - which has it's own pitfalls) and don't just try to dissolve any negatives.

    When setting a new precedent, my belief is that it should be able to replicate the current process (and more)? All this approach does is confuse things, empower the NS standings (which are about inclusion/encouraging more polo, not necessarily about competition/accuracy) and potentially relieve a qualification tournament of a couple teams (this will not affect all other teams equally/fairly).

About