What if a team can't make it to enough NS events to qualify (financial, or restrictions on holiday time)?
What if teams resort back to their dynamic line-up nature, would you propose qualifying the individuals instead, as in NA?
What if the Euros organiser distributes spots differently next year (to cities/regions/etc)?
My personal view is that it's more likely that most teams would be able to make it to a qualifying event (that can potentially use the same court size/rules/whatever as the Euros itself) than several NS events. The London League is a whole different kettle of fish and seems largely irrelevant for UK (& I, sigh) Euros qualification.
Cosmic, with or without a sub, should be good enough to qualify from the UKI tournament.
This... a team is only as good as it's parts, subbing out one part is a similar precedent to taking a sub (2 of 3 ruling) for the tournament itself, I don't see the problem, Cosmic will still destroy most teams?
As the national governing body, UKHBPA
Currently it's just an initialism, the UKHBPA need to get their ducks in a row...
What if a team can't make it to enough NS events to qualify (financial, or restrictions on holiday time)?
What if teams resort back to their dynamic line-up nature, would you propose qualifying the individuals instead, as in NA?
What if the Euros organiser distributes spots differently next year (to cities/regions/etc)?
My personal view is that it's more likely that most teams would be able to make it to a qualifying event (that can potentially use the same court size/rules/whatever as the Euros itself) than several NS events. The London League is a whole different kettle of fish and seems largely irrelevant for UK (& I, sigh) Euros qualification.
This... a team is only as good as it's parts, subbing out one part is a similar precedent to taking a sub (2 of 3 ruling) for the tournament itself, I don't see the problem, Cosmic will still destroy most teams?
Currently it's just an initialism, the UKHBPA need to get their ducks in a row...