-
• #2
how wet is wet? interested to hear to what level HH is allowing riding on.
thanksIt's up to whoever is running the session or race meet.
Personally, when I do my risk assessment, I don't allow riders on a wet track (that's in the rain or with a wet surface which isn't drying) It's stupid IMO. Even crits get called off when it's wet sometimes, and that's on the flat with road bikes which are designed for riding outside.
Discretion and common sense are important, as a light summer shower isn't necessarily going to mean everyone has to go home, likewise it's naive to stand there in a March thunderstorm expecting to get on any time soon.
-
• #3
yep. same situation here.
you experience this annoying time between soaked and dry, where lines are still slippery, but tarmac grips. frustrating as hell when youre making the call.look forward to seeing results from HH when they get up on BC site.
-
• #4
Why the fuck don't they use paint with sand in it or something similar?
-
• #5
Can I quote you verbatim when the next conversation about lines comes up?
Reaction might be fun -
• #6
The lines at HH (but not the cote d'azur) were sanded by the contractor after the problem was pointed out (and a little persuading was done). Looking like the volunteers at HH are going to do the cote d'azur themselves.
-
• #7
let me know when this happens as I want to help
-
• #8
yep. same situation here.
you experience this annoying** time between soaked and dry**, where lines are still slippery, but tarmac grips. frustrating as hell when youre making the call.
.No dry no ride, simple!
I'm struggling to see why some people are having such an issue with this, riding a wet track is effing dismal.
-
• #9
No dry no ride, simple!
I'm struggling to see why some people are having such an issue with this, riding a wet track is effing dismal.
If there's no riding other than when dry- why did they sand the lines?
Sorry to keep carping on about it. -
• #10
We rode last night and it drizzled all the way through the evening and the tarmac was wet. A lot of riders went home because they either thought it was going to be called off or didn't fancy riding on the wet tarmac. I guess they will decide on a case by case basis. They called off the last race but that was due to light not the wet surface.
-
• #11
This is what I mean.there's obviously wet-soaking-presently raining.
Then there's degrees of damp right down to dry-perfect.
And that black tarmac is o.k in quite a lot of cases
I'm gonna build an outdoor track underneath a road flyover smooth concrete everywhere and it will perfect every day -
• #12
If there's no riding other than when dry- why did they sand the lines?
Sorry to keep carping on about it.Because they were asked to. It's more about how quickly it dries after being wet, the lines were supposedly delaying this process. HH is busy and every hour counts. Personally I think the lines were/are a bit of a red herring, the cote dazur however was absolute rubbish when wet!
Like I said, depends who is running what. Racing can have different rules to training. Rider safety isn't something I like to gamble with but skilled riders can ride it easily when wet. Question is, why would you want to?
-
• #13
skilled riders can ride it easily when wet. Question is, why would you want to?
Precious BC points at all costs?
-
• #14
Precious BC points at all costs?
Of course! Silly me.
As you were.
-
• #15
Wow I started a thread without even knowing it.
But now RPM is having a discussion quoting himself.
What a strange day thought Alice -
• #16
You've gone soft, Rob. A lot of bearings are sealed these days, and even well greased cups and cones roll for miles and miles and miles in the wet without maintenance; there's fuck all road shite on the velodrome, so all the spray's relatively clean; there comes a point where indoor alternatives become demotivating/unappealling; there's a whole new skillset to be learnt for each set of riding conditions in the context of the weather (and you could argue that crosswinds are far more dangerous than a damp track with a moderate loss of traction - certainly less predictable); blah blah blah.
Don't get me wrong. There also comes a point where yet another ride in the damp/rain becomes equally unmotivating, whatever the setting, but if you can't embrace meteorological variety in this country, you're limiting your options.
-
• #17
You've gone soft, Rob. A lot of bearings are sealed these days, and even well greased cups and cones roll for miles and miles and miles in the wet without maintenance; there's fuck all road shite on the velodrome,.
Like I said, enjoy. It's not for me as I can't afford to mistreat my DA hubs and BB as they're the only ones I've got.
It's not like that many races/sessions get rained off in a season. Relax, take it easy, have a day off once in a while... -
• #18
Wow I started a thread without even knowing it.
But now RPM is having a discussion quoting himself.
What a strange day thought AliceI did it so as not to derail the league thread ;)
-
• #19
I'm all for days off the bike. But sometimes circumstances dictate that the one chance you get to turn the pedals in anger during a week, or even a fortnight, happens on a damp day. If that opportunity were scuppered by a coach cancelling a session based on his own analysis, one built around his own over-protective attitude towards retrogrouch equipment, it'd be annoying.
-
• #20
retrogrouch-ha! Yeah I clocked that. You could merge every post I ever made it wouldn't bother me its all meganet
-
• #21
RPM's opinions do not reflect the views of the HH management as a whole. There are other coaches who, although equally concerned about the safety of the riders, do not want to unnecessarily cancel sessions when the track is perfectly grippy.
There is a whole spectrum of differing opinions from Rob's "no dry, no ride" to the other extreme of "if it's not currently raining it's dry enough".
Having ridden the track when it is completely wet (on track tyres pumped hard) and not felt any slipping (even when i started chucking the bike up and down the banking)- I'd say that it is probably fine to ride in the damp, but would want to be completely sure before coaching a session on it.
Official HH policy on this coming soon - in the mean time check twitter (@hernehillvel) for updates on whether each particular session is likely to go ahead.
Why people would want to ride on a wet track is another question, and up to them to decide for themselves
The lines were sanded down because they were slippery when damp but the track was not, now the lines and tarmac are equally slippery/unslippery. Had nothing to do with the lines preventing the track from drying faster.
-
• #22
I'm all for days off the bike. But sometimes circumstances dictate that the one chance you get to turn the pedals in anger during a week, or even a fortnight, happens on a damp day. If that opportunity were scuppered by a coach cancelling a session based on his own analysis, one built around his own over-protective attitude towards retrogrouch equipment, it'd be annoying.
What a strange thing to say. A coach's own bicycle isn't relevant to his sessions. The coach is responsible for risk assessing the environment, if he feels there is a danger to the riders then he makes a call. The call isn't made on how wet the rider's bearings might get, it's made on an assessment of the rider's ability and how the conditions will impact the session.
My comments on my equipment were made regarding my personal feelings on (me) riding in the wet.
-
• #23
RPM's opinions do not reflect the views of the HH management as a whole. There are other coaches who, although equally concerned about the safety of the riders, do not want to unnecessarily cancel sessions when the track is perfectly grippy.
There is a whole spectrum of differing opinions from Rob's "no dry, no ride" to the other extreme of "if it's not currently raining it's dry enough".
Having ridden the track when it is completely wet (on track tyres pumped hard) and not felt any slipping (even when i started chucking the bike up and down the banking)- I'd say that it is probably fine to ride in the damp, but would want to be completely sure before coaching a session on it.
Official HH policy on this coming soon - in the mean time check twitter (@hernehillvel) for updates on whether each particular session is likely to go ahead.
.
Please see my comments regarding assessment of conditions with a bearing on rider ability. A blanket 'official' policy isn't worth jack shit tbh as your anecdotal evidence (as an experienced) rider will not be of relevance when coaching a group of 1st timers. At the other end of the scale, sprinters doing standing starts isn't going to work on a wet surface either.
Cooky's opinions do not reflect the views of HH management as a whole.
-
• #24
Why people would want to ride on a wet track is another question, and up to them to decide for themselves
.
Actually mate it's not. It's up to those responsible for the rider's welfare during the session/race meet. Up to riders only after that decision has been taken.
-
• #25
I'm going to refer all future wet riding decisions to you. I want you to take into consideration:
- possibility of stubborn staining to any non-black areas of lycra kit
- sponginess of cork bar tape, and how that might impact on eventual wrinkling of the skin on my fingers
- ph balance of precipitation and its effect on longevity of tyre casings
- likelihood that unreachable grit particles will get in the little creases of the leather edging on the underside of my saddle
- detailed float assessment of cleats with extra H2O lubrication
- risk of mildew on my sprinter's deckchair whilst stored in a damp and folded state
- possibility of stubborn staining to any non-black areas of lycra kit
how wet is wet? interested to hear to what level HH is allowing riding on.
thanks