You are reading a single comment by @skydancer and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • So you're saying that such an organisation would also have the potential of becoming corrupted like any powerful body even if it starts off with good intentions?

    I suppose her point is that the 'grassroots tweeters' are able to minimise the risk of this and express their views instantly (unlike a 4/5 year period for a western democratic election to reflect the views of the people)

    As you know I am part of a cooperative (which i take as an anarchistic model) and the balance between empowering people within this to act and make decisions, if they do not contradict our core principles, has to exist within a framework of consensus. It is tough sometimes and we have to accept that one member can block a decision.

    On reflection you largely run lfgss on cooperative lines of this nature as evidenced by recent Addison Lee actions where you went along with 2 out of the 3 actions you proposed when one was 'blocked' by members. And the lfgss is founded on the core principles of ride bikes and drink beer (or dark rum)

About

Avatar for skydancer @skydancer started