No-Fork project, bicycle geometry hacked

Now for the cliffhanger, the oh so important advantages. I think it was happytramp to revamp what Ive said on that subject before. It has not been my objective to claim or prove anything in this respect. Nor do I have any ambitions in that direction. But Im happy with any pro's and con's discussed here (with respect that is). If I was to name a purpose or advantage of the bike it would need to be that it achieves its objectives in the most feasible simple way. Usually all sort of advantages come along with concepts that fulfill that (the less is more..) criterion. If that is the case for the No-Fork we will have to see, won't we. I personally dont have any ambition to have any pretensions on that subject.

I looked at it like I do all concept bikes/cars/etc. A proof of concept, that answers a certian curiousity. Nicely worked through.

Wether or not the bike, or aspects from it. Become commercially useful. Is'nt a measure of its ingenuity for me.