No-Fork project, bicycle geometry hacked

[quote=mdcc_tester]I'm sure any reasonably competent cyclist could ride around any of these problems, since they will all be of small enough magnitude to be lost in the noise, but they are also the kinds of small issue which make the difference between a bike which feels good and one which is annoying.
You know nothing about my bike and I will say it for the last time: that is not the idea of my bike. Try get your head around it.[/QUOTE]
I'm sure I'll have no trouble getting my head around it just as soon as you tell us what your bike is for. If I know nothing, it's because that's the extent of what you have told us. I don't understand what relevance your petulant little outburst has to that particular part of my post.

Your thanks for my pointing out why Mike Burrows went with offset track on the Lotus is misplaced; he wasn't doing the same thing as you, and he had valid reasons for doing it while you have offered no such justification for your deviation.

Real Testers have questions and search for explanations, have fun doing that.

As you seem to be speaking English as a second language, you probably need to have 'tester' explained to you in the context of English cycling; it's slang for a time triallist. Testers, by definition, are not having fun when they are testing.