-
• #1627
ew no
-
• #1628
That is horrible.
I get massively annoyed at their downtube graphics. Is it supposed to be read clearly by the rider? Because everyone else reads 'KOOL'.
Which isn't cool.
-
• #1629
I read NUJL actually.
-
• #1630
Re: all this rack talk, I have this: http://www.sjscycles.co.uk/alloy-front-carrier-cantilever-boss-mounting-black-alloy-prod14021/
And I just bolted it to my forks with my canti bolts. Relatively simple. Took a bit of tinkering to get it all working right, but I haven't touched it since in thousands of miles.
-
• #1631
And it's cheap-cheep. And slightly bent, thanks to some airport baggage handlers.
-
• #1632
Also in relation to the rack talk, I have a Basil which was pretty cheap, and I chopped the rear or upright part down a bit which reduces weight a little.
-
• #1633
Thanks for the rack advise on the last page, it's to fit this
with a calliper brake.
-
• #1634
Salsa minimalist?
Not cheap though.
-
• #1635
Not cheap and it sit quite far forward, which is fine if your bike doesn't have that much of a slack geo.
edit, this is what I mean;
-
• #1636
Do you have a price range? Looking for something in particular? Chunky? Sleek? Colour? Load-bearing ability?
-
• #1637
Not cheap and it sit quite far forward, which is fine if your bike doesn't have that much of a slack geo.
I cant see why it would need to be that far forward. All the attachment arms are adjustable.
-
• #1638
Thanks for the rack advise on the last page, it's to fit this
with a calliper brake.
I have those forks on the bike I have the Basil on . I used to have a Blackburn rack that attched to the lowrider bosses on them.
-
• #1639
Regarding rear rack, would those be a solution? it's designed for the fork, but could be retrofitted for the rear;
-
• #1640
Any thoughts on this? Looks like crap but costs next to nothing on 'bay:
-
• #1641
Only "about" 21g more than that nice Nitto. But it does look like ass.
-
• #1642
They look fine, only concern is the lack of adjustment (as far as I can see).
-
• #1643
I looked at it myself. I dont like the fact that it only mounts on the canti mounts. Seems like it would pivot and bend forward to me.
-
• #1644
Reckon like most small rack, can only sustain a certain weight.
-
• #1645
True, but you'd want it mounted to the fork bridge as well I think.
TBH it looks like something you could bodge yourself.
-
• #1646
Looks to me like it can be mounted on (or under) the fork bridge: has the same attachment extras as every other Blackburn copy.
-
• #1647
anyone here used a cetma rack??
tempted to drop the dollar, but interested to see if they're as good as they look....
-
• #1648
They are.
If you're looking for reasonably priced and weighted porteur rack, check the Gamoh porteur.
-
• #1649
I had an early Cetma. Seemed solid, but ugly welds and heavy; the stays used for mine were the standard Wald units that come with their racks (Laine makes his own now).
He is a pleasant guy to deal with, forthright and true. -
• #1650
Not cheap and it sit quite far forward, which is fine if your bike doesn't have that much of a slack geo.
edit, this is what I mean;
yeah but they're adjustable in 3 different places no? so surely can be pushed back a bit
Wrong thread. But I really liked this. Plenty wont I suppose.
http://media1.roseversand.de/product/1850/1/8/1833654_1.jpg