Bryan, Alan and Ron are a team. They need to play 3 tournaments together to get a NS ranking, but really only 2 of them need to play together at 3 tournaments to get a NS ranking. This seems reasonable?
From a rankings perspective it is more desirable to have Bryan/Alan/Geoff, Bryan/Alan/Vincent and Bryan/Alan/John H play these tournaments than 3 completely different lineups (IE Bryan/Alan/Fred, Bryan/Ron/John H, Ron/Alan/Fred).
Alright there were more posts.
Bryan, Alan and Ron are a team. They need to play 3 tournaments together to get a NS ranking, but really only 2 of them need to play together at 3 tournaments to get a NS ranking. This seems reasonable?
From a rankings perspective it is more desirable to have Bryan/Alan/Geoff, Bryan/Alan/Vincent and Bryan/Alan/John H play these tournaments than 3 completely different lineups (IE Bryan/Alan/Fred, Bryan/Ron/John H, Ron/Alan/Fred).