-
• #60402
.
-
• #60403
tiny! Love it
-
• #60404
fuck yesss
-
• #60405
peas
-
• #60406
^whatever
-
• #60407
Paul playing card chainrings are always anti.
-
• #60408
^ was just about to say the same.
-
• #60409
Everything Paul make (apart from that lever) is always anti.
ftfy
-
• #60410
but oh my isn't that little lever lovely.
-
• #60411
ftfy
Bollocks.
Thumbies are fecking genius.
#havesomeinthepost
-
• #60412
Which lever now? The brake lever is mighty uncomfortable
-
• #60413
Their drop outs look fine too
-
• #60414
-
• #60415
Crazy prices for stuff that can easily be replicated for less than half the price. I mean, £13 for that ^? The bolt probably cost them 0.5p and the mount could be made in less than 5min on a lathe. They make some nice parts but it's all overpriced imo, I don't see a reason for the price apart from brand tax.
-
• #60416
Paul components = hipster tat.
-
• #60417
I could'nt find a better solution than the thumbie. Its a great product.
I would'nt bother with much of the rest. But its not all tat.
-
• #60418
Massive generalisation, obv. ;)
-
• #60419
Massive generalisation, obv. ;)
TBH. Having just loked into, and ordered, some Sram thumbies. I thought 'no way Paul stuff rocks'.
But when I just checked, the tat index was pretty bloody high.
-
• #60420
As C.B. says, the dropouts look nice but I reckon they're a recipe for seizing (I'm sure I've heard of this happening). And I don't like how cantilevered they make the rear end look.
Some of the rest of it you think 'ok, looks quite nice' but then the price is jokes. And the cranks are just horrid.
The Thumbies do look neat though.
-
• #60421
loads of decent paul stuff, but just jokes price!
on that note, some nice bikes using paul:
-
• #60422
-
• #60423
Why is it in a sauna?
-
• #60424
To make it more steamlined.
-
• #60425
To make it more steamlined.
Lovely bike :)