Jeez, you have completely ignored a very important point that MDCC has made:
this is why we ignore anecdote and study populations; if you measure the passing distance enough times, you get a statistically significant view of whether some factors relating to the cyclist influence the behaviour of a population of drivers.
Much of what you have said, especially in point 1, is based on well thought out anecdotes and assumption.
Jeez, you have completely ignored a very important point that MDCC has made:
Much of what you have said, especially in point 1, is based on well thought out anecdotes and assumption.