You are reading a single comment by @The_Seldom_Killer and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Point 4 - aren't the Highways Agency more involved in Motorways & Trunk Rds than city streets (council tax contributes to these)?

    If so, why must they pay for city cycle lanes - little to no direct modal shift there.

    I think it's one of the areas where the Times need to explain themselves better. However, Trunk roads have a habit of occupying a lot of space in cities as well as frequently running through the middle of large towns and anything smaller. I understand that the HA still retains responsibility for a lot of these roads. On top of that trunk roads often form the most effective route between towns and cities so development of cycling facilities along them would improve the opportunities to get between them. It's all well and good devising a lovely quiet route for cyclists but if you're more interested in getting from A to B then instead of something winding and quiet you would probably prefer the option to take something quick and efficient. If infrastructure is going to be meaningful, the HA need to be fully invested and on board with the whole movement.

    Most motorway junctions could do with a serious revamp as well.

About