Rob/Andy/Adam - reread my OP (10740) - I was not suggesting those lineups, merely pointing out that those, on paper, satisfied the most people out of the six mathematically! There were only muted responses from Rob and Andy at the time and it took us no further forward in 3 days as far as I can see.
I didn't/don't accept that people saying/posting nothing = no objections. Hence I saw little progress and suspect we've probably reached a natural conclusion to the discussion.
I am not prepared to 'try-before-I-buy' on Thursday (or any other day) - that's merely replacing this 'process' with another open-ended one and it will drag on and on beyond Bristol.
Of my three favoured original lineups and in the interests of getting on with it, I'm pushing for - Andy/Em/Neil.
Rob/Andy/Adam - reread my OP (10740) - I was not suggesting those lineups, merely pointing out that those, on paper, satisfied the most people out of the six mathematically! There were only muted responses from Rob and Andy at the time and it took us no further forward in 3 days as far as I can see.
I didn't/don't accept that people saying/posting nothing = no objections. Hence I saw little progress and suspect we've probably reached a natural conclusion to the discussion.
I am not prepared to 'try-before-I-buy' on Thursday (or any other day) - that's merely replacing this 'process' with another open-ended one and it will drag on and on beyond Bristol.
Of my three favoured original lineups and in the interests of getting on with it, I'm pushing for - Andy/Em/Neil.