It's almost certainly counter productive to have either of them on the comittee. They should of course be consulted, but aas a decision making body it is far more effective to have people who are capable of making an informed decision and seeking input from all neccesary and relevant sources than those emotionally wedded to a specific issue.
Not saying that either Jon or I should be on the committee (no real desire to), but I'm slightly perplexed to be described as emotionally wedded to a specific issue. Do you want to illuminate?
Not saying that either Jon or I should be on the committee (no real desire to), but I'm slightly perplexed to be described as emotionally wedded to a specific issue. Do you want to illuminate?