I regret the Daily Mail style tone used in The Times piece, language designed to provoke fear and horror, e.g. people being 'thrown under lorries' etc. I would be interested in how much they've worked with other orgs (LCC, BC, Sustrans etc). At least they titled it 'cities fit for cycling' and not 'cities safe for cycling'.
I regret the Daily Mail style tone used in The Times piece, language designed to provoke fear and horror, e.g. people being 'thrown under lorries' etc. I would be interested in how much they've worked with other orgs (LCC, BC, Sustrans etc). At least they titled it 'cities fit for cycling' and not 'cities safe for cycling'.