Films

...post-postmodern...

Let me see if I understand you. We have shifted epochs again? If the 'postmodern' has extinguished/got bored/taken the bins out and been superseded/improved upon/been kicked out of bed by what follows in its double prefix moniker insisted upon in your position, is it not the case that the perambulation has arrived back from whence it already came? Isn't that a subversion of ethics?

Is the liquidity inherent in the rapidity of transitory ephemera associated with the topic solidified as manifest repetition, the same to which Vienna succumbed all those years ago? The formulation, and forgive me for stating the ironically obvious, is inimical to its fundamental economic limits. These are not apparent to me in your assumption. The temporal plane has its boundaries collapsed as the forces of territorialisation scamper through the politics of the self-project, and I sense you're following my argument clearly now, as if that is all there ever is, was and could ever be under the previous schemata. I'm not convinced.