-
• #4877
just saw this too
-
• #4878
Real?
Look at the pixels.
Lame... -
• #4879
If its real, the top would be very bent if she looked forward #obviousfakeisobvious
-
• #4880
right own up, who's is this?
-
• #4881
Valerie Vargas, Ed Hardy design. So good.
-
• #4882
Ed Hardy, on Chad Koeplinger (the tattoo is 10 years old).
-
• #4883
Who tattoos a 10 year old?!
-
• #4884
Gypsies.
-
• #4885
fair point
-
• #4886
My guess is that the tattoo is ten years old as opposed to the subject.
-
• #4887
Nazi's tattooed ten year olds as well.
-
• #4888
Fixed.
-
• #4889
-
• #4890
-
• #4891
-
• #4892
Pisti will explode when he sees this page!
-
• #4893
What's the protocol in here? Have found quite a few good bits of work, but one might say fairly "provocative" photos.... Is it bad form to post things that will no doubt lead to "I would yentz that for breakfast, brunch, lunch, dinner, tea and supper...."?
-
• #4894
They'll get quoted and earn a standard comment regarding what he'd potentially do with a spare couple of hours on his hands.
-
• #4895
-
• #4896
Brace yourself love.
-
• #4897
"First professional photoshoot, wanted to share my ink.."
-
• #4898
why?
-
• #4899
What's the protocol in here? Have found quite a few good bits of work, but one might say fairly "provocative" photos.... Is it bad form to post things that will no doubt lead to "I would yentz that for breakfast, brunch, lunch, dinner, tea and supper...."?
I understand that showing flesh is part of the tattoo thread (duh, as a heavily tattooed lady I get it, right?) but when the image becomes more about the naked woman than about the tattooes, oh...I don't know. You know what I think. It creates a bad environment, yadda yaddah.
-
• #4900
guilty as charged, posted "outlaw patriot" entirely for the body shot, not the ink.....
Charissa Gregson, and she does AMAZING flowers.