-
• #58902
is that a mermaid fucking an elephant?
-
• #58903
you're meant too see what you want to see i think
-
• #58904
-
• #58905
Offf... and you were doing so well.
That is one ugly bike.
So many trolls on this forum.
-
• #58906
Now thats an ugly bike.
-
• #58907
[QUOTE=TheorySwine;2639641]
Now thats a salvé bike.[/QUOTE]
ftfy
-
• #58908
huuuuh?
-
• #58909
The second Bridgestone and the Bishop bike on this page are the best built up versions of both brand i have ever seen.
-
• #58910
So many trolls on this forum.
Nah, you need to think about it a little. Straight post with the saddle that far back on the rails? That stem? DA 7900 looks horrible on that bike. Sky high front end, not keen on the wheels or the contact points either.
-
• #58911
Nah, you need to think about it a little. Straight post with the saddle that far back on the rails? That stem? DA 7900 looks horrible on that bike. Sky high front end, not keen on the wheels or the contact points either.
I agree, but it has so much more potential than a lot of other bikes on this thread.
But i disagree about the DA and wheels. -
• #58913
Yes. Thats done it. Thats a smile on my face.....
-
• #58914
DA 7900 looks horrible on that bike
We'll have to take your word for that, since the illustrated example has 7800.
-
• #58915
-
• #58916
We'll have to take your word for that, since the illustrated example has 7800.
Oops. It's what I meant. I think they can look good on some frames, just not that one.
-
• #58917
bummed I sold the one on the right :(
-
• #58919
TheorySwine, good strong posts from you of late, have some rep dear boy
-
• #58920
frejus 04 by CicliDevotion, on Flickr -
• #58921
bummed I sold the one on the right :(
what did you replace it with?
-
• #58922
thats why i said the second Bridgestone, not that one.
srry didn't recognize the blue tarck one
-
• #58923
what did you replace it with?
hm don't remember exactly. probably funded my LOOK 585
-
• #58924
no problem.
-
• #58925
it is peas though