It was entirely correct as I was talking to John. This was apparent as I quoted his post.
I haven't accused you of presenting anything as anything.
In fact, until this reply, I hadn't addressed you in any way, shape or form.
Ha - I was being pedantic.
I believe DaveH originally criticised *me * by stating I had made assumptions. He didn't say that I was presenting statements as facts without any supporting evidence. So he didn't criticise anyone for that per se.
You questioned DaveH for calling out others for presenting statement as fact, but as far as I can see the did not do that. So he is within his rights to do that himself, to the extent that it is not contradictory with his previous admonishments.
Anyway, this is about as worthwhile as the original discussion, especially since I believe we are both in agreement that in the vast majority of instances the right thing to do is wait at red lights.
Ha - I was being pedantic.
I believe DaveH originally criticised *me * by stating I had made assumptions. He didn't say that I was presenting statements as facts without any supporting evidence. So he didn't criticise anyone for that per se.
You questioned DaveH for calling out others for presenting statement as fact, but as far as I can see the did not do that. So he is within his rights to do that himself, to the extent that it is not contradictory with his previous admonishments.
Anyway, this is about as worthwhile as the original discussion, especially since I believe we are both in agreement that in the vast majority of instances the right thing to do is wait at red lights.