Cycle campaigning

This here is yet another example of the dividing lines being drawn http://www.lfgss.com/thread77390.html. Naturally it has prompted quite a reaction from 'us', which I think purposefully fails to recognise some of the more reasonable points the article makes.

This here is stream of cuntery many levels up from anything i would expect to see in print. Naturally it has prompted a reaction from us and it should prompt a (violent!) reaction from anyone who reads it. The only valid points are that we usually come off worse in a collision and that imperfect cycling contributes to some accidents (both of which the cunt states in more exaggerated forms). It's in places ignorant, throughout morally cowardly and outright dangerous given the target audience.