Shredder, I love your ingenuity, but if we did what you suggest, some poor fuck would have to be the CEO of LFGSS. Any takers?
The scenario wasn't meant to be taken literally but just to provoke some thoughts. Anyway, David has already been doing the CEO role since day nought, so that is not an additional burden. Of course, it assumes LFGSS is already incorporated. If David has a company that he could use for the purpose, say, Kitchen Ltd., then that could also be a consideration...
On another note, whilst I appreciate the desire to focus on putting together the product, I think that each founding member should keep in mind that starting and running a new company necessarily means that each person needs to wear 12 different hats at the same time. You won't be able to do just one job in the beginning: doing just one job is a luxury you get to have when you are a profitable company of a certain size, with an army of employees running around. And, if you are one of the owner-proprietors, then don't expect to be able to do just one job EVER. Just saying.
The scenario wasn't meant to be taken literally but just to provoke some thoughts. Anyway, David has already been doing the CEO role since day nought, so that is not an additional burden. Of course, it assumes LFGSS is already incorporated. If David has a company that he could use for the purpose, say, Kitchen Ltd., then that could also be a consideration...
On another note, whilst I appreciate the desire to focus on putting together the product, I think that each founding member should keep in mind that starting and running a new company necessarily means that each person needs to wear 12 different hats at the same time. You won't be able to do just one job in the beginning: doing just one job is a luxury you get to have when you are a profitable company of a certain size, with an army of employees running around. And, if you are one of the owner-proprietors, then don't expect to be able to do just one job EVER. Just saying.