-
• #377
South Is easier for me
-
• #378
Should be souths to ref Sunday
-
• #379
Me I mean
-
• #380
Wooden Skullz vs Debbie does Dulwich...
...nice quick clean games all round, DDD played well but just weren't finishing and had some bad luck, wooden skulls controlled the games and had a lot of shots.Really enjoyed these games, regardless of the losing. Great to get helpful feedback from people who watched too, really appreiate it. ♥ing the league so far.
-
• #381
score from skulls v dinos third game?
Skulls 4 - 0 Dinos
Skulls 3 - 2 Dinos
Skulls 5 - 0 DinosI think Chukker wrote the scorers for the third in Turd's notebook.
-
• #382
Updated all scores and results on the web site.
(if possible, pm scores as I might miss them in here)
-
• #383
I'm gonna update the spreadsheet to add some extra columns (w/d/l) as kev suggested, just wondering what the correct column priority should be for a leaderboard?
I'm thinking it should be:
points > games played > goal difference and nothing else matters
but perhaps it should be
points > games played > goals scored > goals conceded > goal difference
anyone know for sure?
-
• #384
For most sports its:
games played > goals scored > goals conceded > goal difference > points -
• #385
Or, if including W/D/L:
Played/Won/Drawn/Lost/For/Against/GD/Points -
• #386
points last?
-
• #387
yep makes it easier to read
-
• #388
so, if i'm going to make a smaller 'sideabar' table, with only one column, should i just put games won?
-
• #389
yep makes it easier to read
sorry if i'm misunderstanding then, what i'm talking about is how to order the team list to create the ranking, not what it should look like for readablility..
-
• #390
ah
Points > Goal difference > games won in that case -
• #391
With regards to rankings, I agree on points then GD. There's then a bit of a debate to be had on the next most important factor(s). Options include games won, goals scored, head-to-head records etc.
-
• #392
yep, I was just giving my opinion though. After GD, games won would surely be a fairer indicator of a teams ranking than goals scored, though a head to head record is a good option too
-
• #393
Or, if including W/D/L:
Played/Won/Drawn/Lost/For/Against/GD/Pointsso i'll lay it out like this
ah
Points > Goal difference > games won > goals scored > games playedbut the actual rankings will be determined by this
yes?
-
• #394
looks good, nice one josh
-
• #395
great, thanks guys!
-
• #396
Looks good, thanks again josh
-
• #397
Yes, there is the classic head to head vs goal difference debate.
I'm probably in the head to head camp, but both have valid arguments for them.
-
• #398
Hey, we're about to start our own mini-league in Birmingham: http://www.lfgss.com/thread75057.html (if you're interested). Is there any software or web thing that you guys use to manage results/goal difference so everyone can see it etc? Or is Excel/Google docs the only choice?
-
• #399
I thought the first game of NT v SS was 3-2. But maybe that was in my dream.
-
• #400
mods, it might be worth putting a link to the league site in the first post of this thread for an easy link, rather than it being buried in the conversation.
i'm fine coming south