This is a fucking discrace. It says that she haddent undertaken the HGV (while it was stopped) so was therefor in front of it and it just drove into the back of her. As with cars, if you go into the back of someone then it is your fault. Why isnt this the case here?
This is a fucking discrace. It says that she haddent undertaken the HGV (while it was stopped) so was therefor in front of it and it just drove into the back of her. As with cars, if you go into the back of someone then it is your fault. Why isnt this the case here?