Possibly, but only if it works out an appropriate partner. The trouble yesterday was we had teams with byes who were in quite different places in the table, so the match up would not only be unfair to the team who should play someone in a similar position, rather than the other end of the table, but also it would be unfair to other teams, if a team at the top suddenly has an easy game.
I'm a little confused about the logic behind challonge, maybe it was the byes fucking it up yesterday. The main principle of Swiss to to play the closest team you've not played yet (and that that game doesn't produce impossible games in that round, or future rounds). Sometimes yesterday it seemed to choose strange pairings.
Yeah it's the logic behind challenge that I'm interested in, for that reason.
I imagine it selects the team with a bye by just dropping the bottom team or something? It wouldn't be too hard to have the selection of bye's based on who was bye'd in the previous round?
Yeah it's the logic behind challenge that I'm interested in, for that reason.
I imagine it selects the team with a bye by just dropping the bottom team or something? It wouldn't be too hard to have the selection of bye's based on who was bye'd in the previous round?