National Series 2011

Bit of a blast from the past, but this has been bugging me:

Been giving some thought to the 3/4 scores issue...

I ran a few models using weighted random data and found that on average ~20% of teams would finish in a different place. Neither is perfect but using 4 is more likely to give us accurate placings. It may also provide an incentive for people to play more tournaments or it may make them think there's no point. Not sure and I think it's close between the two. The consensus on here seems to be that 4 is fine (remember you can use a sub), so for this year I think it would be prudent to lean towards accurate final standings and stick with 4 scores.

Have a look at the differences in the scores with the two ways now?!

I notice one minor change!

Obviously it's not over yet...