It'd be nice if we could align our ruleset with the NAH one (same established rules) but perhaps re-word some areas? We could change some Zs to Ss, use our terminology too, that kind of thing? I also think there may be areas of our game that are not covered by the NAH ruleset, we should add these bits in as we see fit?
I really would like to get some sort of input into the rules, if possible, especially with regard to useless rules (e.g. double tap-outs), and I will endeavour to clean-up whatever rule-set eventually emerges, but I don't wish to see us using a rule-set that deviates in more than details from the NAH. I will (obviously) change all the zs to ss.
I really would like to get some sort of input into the rules, if possible, especially with regard to useless rules (e.g. double tap-outs), and I will endeavour to clean-up whatever rule-set eventually emerges, but I don't wish to see us using a rule-set that deviates in more than details from the NAH. I will (obviously) change all the zs to ss.