-
• #4177
I copied and pasted it from your Flickr.
-
• #4178
-
• #4179
Old Tag
New Tag
-
• #4180
Ah. Ok, I can do that...
-
• #4181
O dear... too many pictures.
-
• #4182
and we still don't know where the old tag is.....
-
• #4183
Was in Flickr description: Old water tower, now apartments, just off Chudleigh road near Ladywell park.
-
• #4184
Ahhh I thought I recognised it from the architecture thread a while ago
-
• #4185
My old primary school is just up the hill from it, was gonna tag it previously but it was too dark.
-
• #4186
I have no idea where the rules are, so don't even know what rule 6 is.
So I think the latest version of the rules are these (http://www.lfgss.com/post2229242-2899.html):
- No reflecto porn.
- No blank or near blank walls.
- No hogging the game.
- Locations must be freely accessible to the public.
- Old and new tags must have the same bicycle
- The rules may only be broken only if one of the two following clauses apply
a) It is funny
b) You really, really want to - Rule 6 does not apply in the case of rule 1.
- The committee's decision is final.
although I think we may be heading towards a schism ....
I seriously don't think there should be any rules anymore. Let people play the way they want to, either just tagging to 'win the race' or tagging to have the fun of trying to find a location and then deciding whether or not to go for it, same bike, different bike. And then whether they want to be considerate to the other players and say where it is is up to them. If they want to to tag it close up so you can't even see what it is then fine. Post the pics the wrong way up, upside down, large, tiny. Or even have more than one tag going on at once. Or two threads.
Or post a picture of a location that looks nothing like the tag at all.
- No reflecto porn.
-
• #4187
(Insert winky-smiley thing here)
-
• #4188
How about the two photos have to be taken in one day? The hoarding of pre-taken tags makes it all a bit easy and as if the important thing is to 'win' rather than to ride around a bit.
-
• #4189
^ thought that was a given.
great new tag.
-
• #4190
No, I don't think so. Some people like to have a tag stored on their PC, either to make it quicker or because it's an interesting site.
Me so horny.
-
• #4191
nah, man
-
• #4192
-
• #4193
Me so horny.
haha good!
if i thought this tag would still have been unclaimed i'd have detoured to get it on my ride this morning.
-
• #4194
Hah! Good Clue ... gotta pack today so out of tagging until the end of Sept. Unless you want a crafty tag in SF!
-
• #4195
Old tag:
](http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/844/imag0380z.jpg/) Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG]
Horniman museum, Dulwich.New tag:
](http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/31/imag0367p.jpg/) Uploaded with ImageShack.us[/IMG] -
• #4196
unodis
old: (old father thames, port of london authority building, trinity square, tower hill)
new: (not a clue, but this building is actually waay more attractive than I made it look..)
2 Attachments
-
• #4197
Have just been up to the horniman today and spotted the tag. I was thinking I might have time to go back up later, also no. 2 tags down already.
-
• #4198
It was actually a really pleasant ride going to Dulwich today. I hadn't been down that way before but it was a lovely part of town. The museum is also worth a visit - they've got an awesome collection of stuffed animals in display cases. Excellently creepy.
-
• #4199
unodis
old: (old father thames, port of london authority building, trinity square, tower hill)
new: (not a clue, but this building is actually waay more attractive than I made it look..)
How did you get this up half an hour after the previous tagger posted?
-
• #4200
im fast?
The old tag is with the new one, all sizes? Is this on flickr or in documents? I fail at computers :(