You are reading a single comment by and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Courts were definitely big. but i think the camera and its angle make it look bigger, especially wider, than reality. These weren't that much longer than Philly WHBPC 2009, around 160', with goals set out quite a bit from the back boards. But they were good boards so a hard, wide shot would still rebound all the way back in front of the net.

    I actually think this court size is perfect (i like getting out of my saddle and sprinting, and i don't consider a 32x22 ratio on a flat surface all that exciting). unfortunately the game in the video above doesn't show it very well, pretty boring game. bigger courts = more pretty passing plays, and reduces the effectiveness of offensive blocking/interference as a strategy.

    Our courts in toronto (the bigger of the two in NORTHSIDE 2011 TORONTO on Vimeo
    ) are even longer and wider. i hear the "dump and chase" complaint sometimes, but it's not much of a factor in competitive polo. It happens a bit near the end of a game by a team that has an advantage, but most people will play a possession strategy... it also happens with those players who feel the urge to shoot all the time from no matter where on the court. tends not to be who i choose as a teammate.

    why do i end up writing essays when i post here ?

    Is the rink in that video Trinity Bellwoods? That was a great size. I even enjoy playing lengthwise along the four tennis courts. Losing the ball was a pain, but it was fun as hell.

About

Avatar for   started